0

City solicitor suspended

ATLANTA — The Georgia Supreme Court has suspended an Albany lawyer from practicing after the justices determined he abandoned a client who hired him to pursue a civil claim against the client’s ex-wife.


The Georgia Supreme Court suspended city solicitor and local attorney Tony C. Jones from practicing law for the next 18 months.

This action was the recommendation of a review panel.

The following is the panel's ruling:

In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: October 3, 2011

S11Y1626. IN THE MATTER OF TONY C. JONES.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and

Recommendation of the Review Panel which recommends that Respondent

Tony C. Jones (State Bar Number 403935) be publically reprimanded and made to repay his client the amount of the judgment entered against his client as discipline for Jones’s admitted violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d).

The State Bar has filed exceptions to the Report and Recommendation and seeks Jones’s disbarment. We agree with the State Bar that a public reprimand is insufficient punishment for Jones’s admitted violations, but believe that disbarment is too severe a sanction in this case.

Because Jones failed to file an answer to the Formal Complaint which had

been personally served on him, he was deemed to have admitted all the

allegations made therein, see Bar Rule 4-212(a). Accordingly, we find that in or about August 2007, a client retained Jones to file a contempt action against the client’s ex-wife. Jones filed the petition, but thereafter did not take any action on the client’s behalf. He failed to communicate with the client; failed to respond to the client’s calls and e-mails; failed to provide the client with information about his case despite promising to do so; and failed to tell the client that his ex-wife had filed a counterclaim. Jones continued multiple hearings in the matter without notifying the client. When the court scheduled a hearing in the matter for October 2008, Jones did not notify the client or attend the hearing on his behalf.

In the end, the court entered an order dismissing the client’s contempt action and finding against him on his ex-wife’s counterclaim. Jones did not notify the client about the court’s order, and the client did not become aware of it until he realized his wages were being garnished. The client

filed a grievance against Jones and although Jones was served with the resulting Notice of Investigation, he failed to file a sworn response in accordance with Bar Rules.

Although protecting the public from attorneys who are not qualified to

practice law due to incompetence or unprofessional conduct is the primary

purpose of a disciplinary action, this Court is also concerned about the public’s confidence in the profession generally.

See In the Matter of Ortman, 289 Ga.

130 (709 SE2d 784) (2011); In the Matter of Skandalakis, 279 Ga. 865 (621

SE2d 750) (2005); In the Matter of Brooks, 264 Ga. 583 (449 SE2d 87) (1994).

Reviewing the record in this case, we agree that Jones violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 9.3, and find in aggravation that he knowingly failed to perform services thereby causing serious injury to his client in the form of a lost claim and an adverse judgment; that he obstructed the disciplinary proceedings by not responding to the notice of investigation; and that he has substantial experience in the practice of law. Jones has offered no factors in mitigation of punishment, although it appears that he has no prior disciplinary history.

Given the facts of this case, we believe that Jones’s wholesale

abandonment of his client merits more than a reprimand of any sort, but find disbarment unwarranted at this time. See In the Matter of Livingston, 285 Ga. 173 (674 SE2d 878) (2009) (one-year suspension for abandonment of a client matter; failure to respond to disciplinary proceedings); In the Matter of Zoota, 272 Ga. 496 (532 SE2d 107) (2000) (one-year suspension with conditions for abandonment of a client; no prior disciplinary history).

Instead, we order that Respondent Tony C. Jones be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 18 months from the date of this opinion and that he repay his client the full amount of the judgment entered against him as a condition precedent to reinstatement. Jones is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Eighteen-month suspension. All the Justice concur.

The State Bar had recommended that Tony C. Jones, currently the solicitor for Albany and the Municipal Court judge for Edison, be disbarred for what Supreme Court justices referred to as the “wholesale abandonment” of a client who hired Jones to represent him in a civil matter.

Instead, the justices suspended Jones from the practice of law for 18 months. He also must repay any money he accepted from his client.

City Attorney Nathan Davis said Tuesday that the Albany City Commission did not discuss Jones’ suspension during a closed-door session following its regular workshop meeting Tuesday morning.

According to the opinion rendered by the Georgia Supreme Court, Jones admitted that he was hired by a client in 2007 to file a civil contempt suit against the client’s ex-wife. Jones filed the suit, but following that action he failed to communicate with the client, didn’t return phone calls or emails to the client, and even failed to the tell the client that the ex-wife had filed a counter-suit against him.

The opinion further states that when a hearing was set on the matter in October 2008, Jones not only didn’t tell the client about the hearing, but failed to show up to represent the client’s interests. Subsequently, the court ruled in the ex-wife’s favor.

The client didn’t become aware of the judgment against him, according to the opinion, until after his wages were already being garnished.

“Reviewing the record in this case, we agree that Jones violated (State Bar Rules) and find in aggravation that he knowingly failed to perform services thereby causing serious injury to his client in the form of a lost claim and an adverse judgment,” the justices wrote.

Comments

KaosinAlbany 2 years, 6 months ago

Why did they suspend him? Details, please.

0

KaosinAlbany 2 years, 6 months ago

The City will probably suspend him with pay for the whole 18 months. I wouldn't expect anything less from them.

0

RenayJones30 2 years, 6 months ago

I can't believe this. He is a good person and a good lawyer. What happened? They probably will not do him the way they did weaver. Weaver seems to be the commissioners favorite. He seems to have them in his pocket. Whereas Tony Jones is just an employee and not under the good old boy system like Weaver is.

0

Justice4Moma 2 years, 5 months ago

StrongI was waiting to see Nathans name come up in this.Talk about wrong doing and getting away with it.And Our Officals just keep given him an ata Boy.He should have been disbarred for the gun and knife thing.Not only that but for not doing his job in my case.Which was to charge a person that is his friend and co worker for taking things from a home that did not belong to them.And there was a police on the scene when this was done and made a report on it.But nothing was done other than him telling the Judge that he would not charge this person.Thats his JOB.That is what he gets payed for.To protect us,not the good ole boy system.Oh but i forgot they helped him.My bad.I ll be so glad to see new people in Offices comming up for Voting.

0

Sign in to comment