0

Motion filed in Riggins case

BOE Member is also suspended from job with Girl Scouts

ALBANY, Ga. — South Georgia Assistant District Attorney Heather Lanier filed a motion of intent to present evidence of similar transactions Friday morning against Dougherty County School Board member Velvet Riggins and scheduled a June 5 hearing date before Dougherty Superior Court Judge Stephen Goss.

Riggins was indicted by a grand jury late Wednesday on two felony counts of theft by taking and public record fraud, in addition to a misdemeanor count of theft by taking.

Riggins reportedly earned nearly $30,000 per year as membership manager for the Albany South Georgia Girl Scout Council, but she was suspended from that job on Friday afternoon.

Lanier said Friday that the current indictment stems from two 2011-12 free or reduced school lunch applications filed for Riggins’ two children at Robert Cross Middle and Lincoln Magnet.

The first application, filed on Sept. 20, 2011, listed a total income of just $9,066. Nearly a month later, on Oct. 24, 2011, Riggins filed a second application listing a total income of $39,053.

Morningside Elementary Principal Gloria Baker and her husband, John, were arrested and charged with school lunch fraud in November of 2011. The pair were indicted along with Riggins on Wednesday.

The evidentiary motion filed Friday includes language pointing to lunch applications filed by Riggins for the 2007-08 and 2009-10 school years. Lanier asserts that the “applications failed to fully report or disclose all earnings or wages from all employment and/or all monies received in child support payments on behalf of a school child/children ...”

The motion says that the “state intends to present the evidence of similar transactions during the trial (of Riggins) to prove bent of mind and course of conduct.”

Lanier said the motion was filed mainly to corroborate charges contained in the indictment, but she added that new charges were also possible.

During the period between 2007 and 2011, Riggins filed four lunch applications with the DCSS which showed an income range of between $32,832 and $37,128. According to U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines, those figures qualified her family of four for reduced lunches.

The six lunch applications she filed with the school system has three official signature lines to approve the application: determining, verifying and confirming official. Only the determining offical’s signature was present on all the documents; verifying and confirming were left blank.

The indictment could herald the beginning of yet more trouble for Riggins. South Georgia District Attorney Joe Mullholland said late Thursday that he was preparing to send an indictment report to Gov. Nathan Deal on Friday.

The governor has the option of forming an administrative tribunal consisting of State Attorney General Sam Olens and two of Riggins’ peers — in this case school board members from other school districts — who will review her case and forward a nonbinding recommendation to Deal.

The governor then has the option of removing her from office until the charges are resolved.

Comments

Cartman 2 years, 7 months ago

Justice for Taxpayers! Joe knows he has to keep it out of the hands of the local school board.

0

Bubbavet_rureel 2 years, 7 months ago

Due process works, just ask Zimmerman and Cartman.

0

Sister_Ruby 2 years, 7 months ago

B_r.....just what do you believe about this situation as it relates to guilt or innocence and intent of Ms. Riggins and Ms. Baker? Please take a break from mindlessly defending them and tell us what you think happened and what were they thinking? Please be our friend and tell us. If you can't or won't do that.......you cannot be my friend because friendship has to be earned, not just handed out like lollipops at the bank.

1

Terry.Lewis 2 years, 7 months ago

I like Velvet, I consider her to be a friend. I think it's a shame that her life is basically being tossed into the crapper over a poor decision over what amounts to petty cash.

1

Cartman 2 years, 7 months ago

Actually, that's a fair synopsis.

0

Citizen_A 2 years, 7 months ago

Poor decisions usually do that. It is a shame that she and the Bakers are being "tossed into the crapper" for what amounts to petty cash. But when you are a public (elected) official, or someone with leadership responsibilities, you are held to higher standards and should be examples to your community.

0

G_Michael 2 years, 7 months ago

Petty Cash….all this could have been avoided real easy just by doing the right thing. Taking the WRONG road can lead to TROUBLE.

0

Sister_Ruby 2 years, 7 months ago

Terry you're right on one level......petty cash. BUT there are thousands of people in the SOWEGA area that are taking and taking and taking at both BIG and SMALL levels.....at any level they can get. And they KNOW theY don't personally deserve it but it is all part of a mindset that says, for whatever reason whether it's about their great-great-great grandfather or mother or some twisted sense that "they are OWED it due to circumstances real or imagined" but probably preached and taught to them for years....y'all get the drift....THAT THEY ARE ENTITLED TO IT WHETHER IT'S LEGAL OR NOT. And at the end of the day we now find ourselves with a President of the USA that further reinforces the mindset of class envy and covetousness and would (if HE wer not stopped) take from those who have worked hard and are successful and give it to people who sit around on the front porch all day and will vote Democrat if you'll just have the postman bring them a government check to their house every month.

2

southwestga 2 years, 7 months ago

It's not a lot of money. But lying on the form is wrong for any parent, and certainly for a school board member and a Girl Scout leader! She had every opportunity when this was first coming to light to say whoa, I made a mistake, I'm sorry, here's the money back and some extra for good measure. Lets see how we can improve the monitoring of this program so this never happens again. Maybe she could have even stepped down. Ditto for the Bakers. But instead, no, let's not level with the public, let's waste more taxpayers money and bring further discredit to a school system that's already at the bottom.

2

Sister_Ruby 2 years, 7 months ago

WALB also says that Baker is litigating the School System to get her "15 days without pay" suspension reversed and money back. Now there's some remorse for you.

1

Amazed2 2 years, 7 months ago

They are probably maxed out and need the money to make it.

0

Amazed2 2 years, 7 months ago

The fact that these people are stealing what amounts to a small amount of money each week is just that. That does not change the fact though that it is stealing. If I go to the mall and steal a $10 item each week instead of a $100 each week does that make it less of a crime?? That seems to be the tone of what is going on. I totally disagree that the crime is less if you steal less. If I rob a bank and only get $200 does that mean I should get less time in prison vs. a guy who robs a bank and steals $2000. Both are the same crime, Bank Robbery!!

2

Terry.Lewis 2 years, 7 months ago

My point was that Velvet made a poor decision. Period.

0

Sister_Ruby 2 years, 7 months ago

Poor but deliberate. "Poor decision" makes it sound a little bit like an accident.

0

FlunkyMonkey 2 years, 7 months ago

Well said Amazed2.. a crime is a crime, regardless of the amount. And what about the message this is sending to the kids who are under under instruction? Is this what the future leaders need to be taught?

0

Thurman 2 years, 7 months ago

An income of $37,128 would qualify a household of four (4) for free/reduced school lunches? Give me a break DCSS. I am retired, drawing a pension and Social Security and make nowhere close to that amount. What am I entitiled to---nothing, no free programs.

0

waltspecht 2 years, 7 months ago

Wrong is wrong. No Matter what is said to defend her, she knew she was doing something that was against the rules, and did it anyway. Plus I doubt this was the only poor decision she has made. Things like this represent a culture of corruption. I would imagine if it were really possible to check all the records of all the applicants the fraudulant ones might outweigh the real ones. About like the free cell phones, and the finding that the system supplying them is so riddled with fraud the only way to correct it would be to stop it and start back over. There are generations out there that jump on any Government program that can be exploited, and exploit it. I am not just talking about the poor either. Somehow better accounting and verification standards must be put in place on every government program. The savings might even equal or exceed the cost of hiring folks to track these programs.

0

Terry.Lewis 2 years, 7 months ago

Walt, the only way to stop it is to give everyone free lunches and be done with it. The USDA isn't interested in fraud and neither is the state. That's the truth. The only reason Riggins and the Bakers got nabbed is because someone dropped a dime on them.

0

iko 2 years, 7 months ago

When will Judy Bowles be investigated for hurting the local economy?? The financial harm she causes (and KADB gets government support, so she's using our money to hurt us) makes the Riggins money look like peanuts.

0

Terry.Lewis 2 years, 7 months ago

Iko, Thanks for trying to derail the thread :)

0

southwestga 2 years, 7 months ago

Another aspect of this that is so disturbing is the culture of silence. Surely there were lunch ladies - and others - who were aware that these children were receiving free lunches. They knew that they were children of power and privilege. Why did it take so long for anyone to speak up?

0

Amazed2 2 years, 7 months ago

of course everyone knew what was going on with Baker and Riggins as well as many of the others who are just as guilty but not named at least yet. The code of silence cause "De all in on it" and "De all thinks I's owe it to dem". Unfortunately that is the attitudue. Just like when Katrina hit. People had not place to live but they were running around stealing large screen TV's and wading thru waste deeo water with then when the had no home left, just cause they thought they were free TV's/ Crazy, no power, no food , no nothing but lets go steal a TV bigger that a person cause we ought to have a free TV too. Same with lunchs people are stealing because they thing they sould get it too just because Baker and Rigging are getting Lunches.

0

agonized 2 years, 7 months ago

Those who worked in the lunchroom probably knew they would lose their jobs if they blew the whistle on a school board member or a school principal, and in today's economy, they need the money and especially the health insurance. Other than the manager, probably most working in the lunchroom don't know the kids' names or their lunch status. The whole process is pretty private, so as not to embarass the kids on free or reduced lunch, and it varies how they handle it from school to school, I think.

0

MRKIA 2 years, 7 months ago

TERRY YOU ARE RIGHT ON TRACK WITH THE FREE LUNCH FOR ALL STUDENTS. MONEY CAN BE SAVED BY HAVING PRE-BOXED LUNCHES THAT REQUIRE MINIMAL HANDLING AND PREPARATION. REDUCE THE NEED FOR FULL BLOWN CAFETERIAS AND THE NUMBER OF STAFF TO RUN THEM. A LEGITIMATE BUDGET REDUCING PROPOSAL.

1

Amazed2 2 years, 7 months ago

So I guess the answer to the stealling is that they are stealiing lunches anyway so lets lay off the workers and sit box lunches on the counter for free. Gee maybe the local bank will fire all the tellers and just leave the cash on the counter. Might as well we might get robbed so why pay the teller to count the money. Crazy solutions is all I can say. With solution like this we might as well just shut down government and the laws and courts and embrace anarchly. It is here anyway when the school board and principals are stealing.

0

MRKIA 2 years, 7 months ago

NO, THE ANSWER IS THAT THE LUNCHES ARE BEING PAID FOR ANYWAY SO WHY NOT DO AWAY WITH THE WASTE AND FRAUD AND SAVE SOME MONEY IN THE PROCESS. THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IS IN PLACE TO TEACH CHILDREN, NOT TO PROVIDE CAFETERIA WORKERS WITH JOBS. I'M NOT SUGGESTING RIGGINS AND THE BAKERS NOT BE PROSECUTED. THE LUNCHES SHOULD BE SUPPLIED JUST LIKE BOOKS. ANARCHY OVER SCHOOL LUNCHES? GET REAL.

0

Amazed2 2 years, 7 months ago

And the question I have for you MRKIA why are the lunches being paid for??They are being paid for by taxpayers who a lot of are elderly and have raised their children already and they are being paid for by people who have no kids and the only reason these people as well as the rest of the population of DOCO are paying for Velvet Riggins, Gloria Baker and many many others yet unamed is because of Fraud. So you logic is that we solve the fraud by giving taxpayers money to a principal who besides her husbands income makes over $90,000 per year.. That is Firggin CRAZY. I am trying to figure out if you are mentally challenged, democratic or communist. Like I said I am AMAZED!!!!!!!!!!!!! Welcome to Albany the home of the FREE !! and I mean everything is FREE here except taxes to support the people who make a living off the taaxbase.

0

tballplayer 2 years, 7 months ago

Where else on the planet would you have to spend your whole day without the guarantee of a meal? Even prisoners are given three hots and a cot. Do away with the applications, the lunch cards and the income measurements and feed the kids. Whoever decided that meals should be an accessory and not as important as say, electricity to run the building, needs a clue.

0

Amazed2 2 years, 7 months ago

Well tballpayer you make an interesting point that prisoners are given three meals a day. That said lets just lock up all the lunch cheaters and then they will qualify for 3 meals a day on the taxpayers. Until then they need to work and pay their way in society.

0

VSU 2 years, 7 months ago

Doesn't matter how nice and friendly a person is, but stealing is stealing. If someone was to shoot and kill someone in cold blood, should we ignore the murder case because the shooter was known to be a nice friendly person that everybody loved?

0

agirl_25 2 years, 7 months ago

I don't think it will ever go to trial.....I think the Bakers have more to lose if they go to trial and will have their lawyer waive their right to a jury trial and ask for a bench trial...that a judge decide their fate..... and you know with all the fine upstanding judges you have in the area......(ok you may all stop laughing now) one will surely take into consideration the wonderful people the Bakers are (ok again, stop laughing). Also, I am sure that many letters telling of their fine character and how they are such good Christian people, you know, in church every Sunday (stealing lunch money on Monday) will swamp the judge's desk (telling him/her of their fine character) and he/she will of course take that all into consideration when passing judgement on them. Also he/she will take into consideration the nature of the crime, and whether or not they have a history of criminal activity, different things like that. This is why I sort of don't think the Baker duo will ever go to trial. They may have to pay restitution and maybe as a gesture of showing just how bad they feel about the terrible mistake they made on the form they filled out when their pen slipped and they wrote down the wrong information (and I am sure it was a mistake, huh?) the judge may impose some sort of a slap on the fanny sort of shame shame shame punishment to show you all just how tough he/she can be (and won't we be impressed?). Just a feeling I have about this whole mess. I just can't see justice being done in this case...sorry. This has become too much of a circus so far and I really don't think that there are enough clown cars in the city for all the participants. So get out your seltzer bottles, your bow ties and your horns..and do as I do...keep laughing....what else can you do when you have so many buffoons around? Beep beep beep.........but on a more serious note......I am truly sorry for those of you who live there and have children who go to school in the district....but know that there are some truly wonderful teachers in DoCo and it is a shame that a few bad apples spoiled the basket but it is always going to happen and it looks like it is never going to stop.

0

chinaberry25 2 years, 7 months ago

She has 3 kids if I am not mistaken and this could amount to more than you think. $4.50 per day for 180 days and how long is anybody;s guess.

0

Amazed2 2 years, 7 months ago

Don't know if the Bakers have three kids or not that might be Riggins?? but the Bakers live on a gated estate with one of the nicest houses in NW Albany with a swimming pool, electric gates and very very nice horse stables,etc. She makes at least $90,000 per year and her husband is a contractor.

0

agirl_25 2 years, 7 months ago

That is a nice house....I looked it up on the DoCo Tax Assessors page...very nice looking. A nice picture of the house. According to the open.georgia.gov page Mrs. Baker made $90,814.37 last year. I am impressed with these pages being open to the public.

0

Sister_Ruby 2 years, 7 months ago

To Bubbavet_rureel......(still waiting for a good faith answer)

B_r.....just what do you believe about this situation as it relates to guilt or innocence and intent of Ms. Riggins and Ms. Baker? Please take a break from mindlessly defending them and tell us what you think happened and what were they thinking? Please be our friend and tell us. If you can't or won't do that.......you cannot be my friend because friendship has to be earned, not just handed out like lollipops at the bank.

0

Bubbavet_rureel 2 years, 7 months ago

Niccollo Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke has defined the answer to your questions, they have simular opinions on philosophical, moral, and religious perspectives.

Machiavelli (Realist) expect goverment to keep us civil, and believing you must do what it takes to get and keep power.

Hobbes,(Liberator) expect the people to allow government to agree to keep us civil.

locke, expect government to be limited.

Let's be real, people make bad choices all the time, you have made some, and maybe I have made some. We must slow down and stop participating in destructing people lives, Baker and Riggins have children and family that love them. We need to express ourselves, however, we should refraim from treating people like trash. You may feel that people are in different classes, however, we are on this planet together, and we must work to respect each other.

The Judicial system is fair and impartial, they will give each person due process, my opinion is, if a mistake has been made, learn from it and move on, each person has talents that can benifit this community, we must embrace them and keep moving. Taking people Jobs is not the answer. If you made a mistake, would you want the public to tear you apart. They call it a anarcy (mob) approach.

I voice my opinion because I trully care for each opinion, I may not agree with most of them, but I respect them. We have fun and we get after each other, however, at the end of the day these people have children who are depending on them. We need to support second chances, not one strike you're out.

Since we are friends Sister_Ruby I will defend you also.

Can we be friends? Can you do that.

0

Sister_Ruby 2 years, 7 months ago

Looking for an answer to my question in your epistle.....is it correct to summarize it that Riggins/Baker "made a bad choice". This still sounds too mealy-mouth and weak to me. I get all the rest of your commentary about their families, etc. And your philosophy lesson was over my head.

But to get to the heart of the matter.....elaborate on "bad choice". Yesterday I was driving and I came to a place where I did not know whether to turn right or left and I turned right but should have gone left to get me to my destination. That was a simple mistake, a bad choice which could be corrected by turning around. There was no ethical or moral delimma. I did not break a promise or lie to anyone. I simply made a choice among two totally equal paths. Not the same thing as the Riggins/Baker situation at all!

Is the decision to lie and take what you are not entitled to (there's that word again!) the same as my "bad choice"? NO! Is that the same as an immoral and unethical decision to steal? YES! Did they consciously KNOW what they were doing was stealing and was wrong, unethical, and immoral (not to mention breaking God's law)? YES!

But my original question to you (still unanswered and therefore our friendship remains in limbo.....) is "what were they thinking? What was their intent? Question still unanswered.

0

Bubbavet_rureel 2 years, 7 months ago

Let me restate my response:Strong

  1. These cases are part of the judicial process, only the Jury sometimes refered to as fact finders can listen to the evidence and make a fair impartial decission. This is right out of Constitutional law 1101, which is a requirement for a college education.
  2. Intent again will be decided in the judicial process.
  3. In America people are innocent until proven guilty.
  4. You have not seen the evidence, you have formed an opinion based on hearsay.
  5. Cupabilty of stealing, what does this means to you friend?
  6. Can we be friends?

Breaktime; Teacher will return soon.

Sister_Ruby, are you sure you want to get me started?

Bubbavet_rureel

0

agirl_25 2 years, 7 months ago

Re: this comment Bubba...... "This is right out of Constitutional law 1101, which is a requirement for a college education." I didn't have that as a requirement for my college degree......I actually never heard of a course called Constitutional law 1101. In the late 60's I took some classes at the Walter F. George School of Law at Mercer University in Macon, Georgia and don't recall any classes like that. Let me restate my opinion on what I think is going to happen.......I don't think it will ever go to trial.....I think the Bakers have more to lose if they go to trial and will have their lawyer waive their right to a jury trial and ask for a bench trial...let a judge decide their fate.....and I think we all know what that means in these times.

0

Sister_Ruby 2 years, 7 months ago

Happy to have found something we can agree on. No, we are definitely not on the same educational level. Since you and coach refuse to snitch, we'll have to just wait and see. I hope you will both be happy with the verdict. All I pray to Almighty God for is the Truth to Come and the Judgment Appropriate.

Have a nice week and enjoy your self-imposed insulation from reality, both of you.

0

Bubbavet_rureel 2 years, 7 months ago

Lesson on the verdict:

  1. One side wins, and one side loose.
  2. One side is happy and one side is happy.
  3. Some cases take days, weeks, months, and years.
  4. People with nothing to do will be waiting.
  5. Busy people like me will be traveling.
  6. Sister_Ruby fingers and brain will get tired of speculating.
  7. Some cases are not prosecuted.
  8. Some cases are pleaded.
  9. Wait Sister wait - 1, 2, 5, maybe 10 years.
  10. To be continued - smile Coach.

Note: The reason why the gas prices are high is because of the oil companies speculation.

Sister_Ruby - I enjoy teaching you, the next lesson will be on being positive. Dont let Coach get under your skin, he's using what he learned in psychology 1101. Sister he's working on your equilibrium.

Teacher will be back soon, Can you be my friend?

Bubbavet_rureel

0

Amazed2 2 years, 7 months ago

Honestly!! If Mrs. Rigging and/or Mr. and Mrs. Baker would or could admit that what they did was wrong and publically apologize and make restitution I could easily forgive them and forget. Yes people do make mistakes. Unfortunately, it does not appear that either Mrs. Rigging or the Bakers are willing to do admit that they made an error in judgement. Instead they have "lawyered" up and Baker is trying to recoup her pay for the suspension she got.

0

Bubbavet_rureel 2 years, 7 months ago

Okay, but the framers of the constitution through the people gave us the 5th Amendment, if I was arrested and indicted, I would hire a trained law professional to represent me aswell.

Innocent until proven guilty by the Judicial process.

Respect the privacy laws and let the wheels of justice turn.

We need to be talking about the mistake Zimmerman made, his mistake took a life, not lunch money.

0

Sister_Ruby 2 years, 7 months ago

I think Jesse, Al, Boxer, Panthers, etc etc etc have already been judge and jury on that one. Right?

0

Amazed2 2 years, 7 months ago

Bubber the reason that they both were indicted is simply that neither of them wanted to say I am sorry and I made a mistake and I apologize. If they had done that neither would be facing criminal charges at this time. Instead they had flaughted this to the general public and lawyered up. IF they were truly sorry this would have already been over and out of the news. Mrs. Baker would have gotten a reprimand as deserved and Mrs. Riggins would have or should have stepped down from the BOE. Riggins would have had a much better chance to retain her job at the Girls Scout by being honest in the end and doing the right thing. Now she runs a high risk of being fired. I agree if Baker and Riggins had put this behind the public eye we would not be talking about this case.

0

Bubbavet_rureel 2 years, 7 months ago

Zimmerman stated this at his preliminary hearing, the other you mention are just speculating. They certainly are not apart of the judicial process for Zimmerman. I support the constitution not liberals are conservatives. I stand with the facts, you sure you want to come after me Sister.

Remember ;

  1. Right is Right
  2. Wrong is Wrong
  3. Real is Real
  4. Fake is Fake
  5. And lastly, I'm going to bed, and thats a fact.

See you friend, school is out for today.

Can we be friends? Can you do that? Answer me tomorrow.

Bubbavet_rureel

0

MRKIA 2 years, 7 months ago

BUBBA-VET IT APPEARS YOU NEED REMEDIAL CLASSES IN ETHICS AND MATH. NOT TO WORRY, I WILL BE TEACHING YOU TODAY. 1. IF RIGHT IS RIGHT, THEN IT IS RIGHT TO BRING CHARGES AGAINST RIGGINS AND BAKER BECAUSE : 2. WRONG IS WRONG, AND THEY WERE WRONG TO SIGN UP FOR THE LUNCH PROGRAM AND LIE ABOUT THEIR INCOME AND 3. REAL IS REAL, THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE APPLICATIONS ARE REAL, AND 4. FAKE IS FAKE ,THE CRITERIA ON THE FORMS THEY FILLED OUT IS FAKE OR THEY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN APPROVED. THIS CONCLUDES THE ETHICS CLASS. THE MATH CLASS WILL BEGIN AFTER YOU HAVE YOUR FREE LUNCH.

0

MRKIA 2 years, 7 months ago

BUBBVET, HERE'S THE MATH HOMEWORK YOU NEED TO STUDY: 1. PERSONAL INTEGRITY x 180 DAYS = 0. 2. HONESTY x 180 DAYS = 0. 3.TRUST x 180 DAYS= 0. TRANLATE THIS FOR EXTRA CREDIT: UBI FUMUS, IBI IGNIS.

0

jglass 2 years, 7 months ago

Good grief at these comments. I know people are innocent until proven guilty. So, did these people not falsify income? Did they not complete and sign the forms? How on earth do you think you qualify for free lunches if your income is over $90,000 annually? This did not even take into consideration the spouse's income. And, according to an article, it was proven that Riggins initially falsified income and then changed it later in the year. Now, I don't know if she is a single parent or what, but you get free lunches when your income is $40,000? WOW

0

MRKIA 2 years, 7 months ago

BUBBAVET, TAKE YOUR SEAT, MATH CLASS IS IN SESSION. USE A CALCULATOR IF NEEDED. 1. INTEGRITY x 180=0 2.HONESTY x 180=0
3.PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY x 180=0

TRANSLATE THIS FOR EXTRA CREDIT ( STRONGLY ADVISED): UBI FUMUS, IBI IGNIS.

0

Bubbavet_rureel 2 years, 7 months ago

MRKIA:

Great opinion, however, it's just that. I need to ask about your Intergity, because based on your comments, it's questionable.

A person with Intergrity express themselves without taking people down.

Personal Responsibilty - Is old to the citizens in a civil society.

Honesty - Be honest with yourself, you hate diversity, you hate the demographics of This great city.

Be my friend, can you calculate that?

Bubbavet_rureel

0

MRKIA 2 years, 7 months ago

I FIND IT ODD THAT YOU THINK YOU CAN CASUALLY BEND THE TOPIC 180 DEGREES AND MAKE THE TOPIC ABOUT ME SO LET ME GUIDE YOU BACK TO REALITY, THIS IS WHAT A GOOD TEACHER DOES. YOU NEVER ADDRESSED THE QUESTIONS POSED SO YOU HAVE FAILED TO DEFEND YOUR POSITION. THE SUBJECTS OF THIS ENTIRE DISCUSSION, WHETHER MOMENTARY OR INHERENT IN THEIR PERSONALITY, HAD A LASPE IN HONESTY, RESPONSIBILTY AND INTEGRITY. YOU DEEM IT A FRIVOLOUS UNWARRANTED RACIAL ATTACK. THEIR INTENT TO DEFRAUD WAS ESTABLISHED THE MOMENT THEY PUT PEN TO THE APPLICATION KNOWING FULL WELL THEY WERE OVER-QUALIFIED AND BEING A HIGH PRINCIPAL AND A SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER TO BOOT!!! THEIR ARROGANCE DID NOT SERVE THEM WELL EITHER. THERE'S NO HOPE FOR YOU. YOU CAN'T REVIVE DEAD BRAIN CELLS. TRANSLATION: WHERE'S THERES SMOKE, THERE'S FIRE.

0

Sign in to comment