U.S. Senate, including Isakson and Chambliss, votes to open debate on gun control

Sen. Saxby Chambliss

Sen. Saxby Chambliss

— The U.S. Senate cleared the way on Thursday for an emotional, weeks-long debate on proposals to curb gun violence, rejecting an effort by conservative Republicans to block consideration of gun-control legislation prompted by December's Newtown school massacre.

The Senate voted 68-31 to open debate on President Barack Obama's proposals to expand background checks for gun buyers, tighten restrictions on gun trafficking and increase funding for school security.

The Senate easily cleared the 60-vote hurdle needed to break a Republican filibuster on a bill that has sparked intense lobbying on both sides, including families of the Connecticut victims as well as the powerful gun lobby the National Rifle Association.

"The hard work starts now," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, said after the procedural vote to open debate, which won the support of 16 Republicans.

Twenty-nine Republicans and two Democrats voted to block the gun-control debate. The Democrats were Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Mark Begich of Alaska, who face tough re-election campaigns next year in conservative, gun-friendly states.

The legislation still faces many hurdles, including a weeks-long debate in the Senate featuring many amendments that could make the bill unacceptable to senators who now support it. And if it clears the Senate, it would face a tough reception in the Republican-led House of Representatives.

No major gun legislation has passed the U.S. Congress since 1994.

The vote to proceed with the bill came a day after a compromise agreement on background checks between prominent defenders of gun rights from each party - Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republican Patrick Toomey of Pennsylvania.

That agreement to expand criminal background checks of gun buyers to include commercial sales made at gun shows and online was expected to boost bipartisan Senate support for the measure.

"It is a really important start," Democratic Senator Christopher Murphy of Connecticut said before the vote, displaying photos of some of the victims of the Dec. 14 massacre of 20 children and six adults at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut.

Reid said the expanded background checks, a provision that polls show has the support of up to 90 percent of Americans, will be the first amendment offered in debate. It appears to be Obama's best hope for achieving meaningful gun-control legislation.

But Obama is unlikely to get some elements of gun control that he has advocated, including a ban on rapid-firing "assault" weapons like the one used in Connecticut and limits on the capacity of ammunition magazines.

Reid said amendments to add those provisions to the bill also would be considered by the Senate. Both amendments appear to have a slim chance of winning on the Senate floor.

Obama has called the Newtown tragedy the worst day of his presidency and has made passage of legislation to curb gun violence one of his top domestic policy priorities. He has given recent speeches trying to build public support for gun control, including an appearance last week in Colorado, scene of two of the deadliest gun massacres in American history, and in Connecticut on Monday.

Some family members of Newtown victims flew to Washington from Connecticut on Obama's Air Force One plane to press senators to move forward on gun legislation.

Obama's drive for gun control had lost momentum in the months after the massacre amid strong lobbying by gun rights forces. Many Republicans and some Democrats have objected to the gun-control proposals as an infringement on their constitutional right to own guns.

"This bill is a clear overreach that will predominantly punish and harass our neighbors, friends and family," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who joined the effort to block debate on the bill.


bigbob 2 years, 7 months ago

These morons vote for gun control they will be gone around here.


Albanite 2 years, 7 months ago

I wonder why they refuse to represent their constituents?


D_Zaster 2 years, 7 months ago

The second amendment is not subject to a up or down vote by ANY legislative, judicial, or executive branch. There is a process to amend the Constitution, and if it is so wanted, as the President, as well as others, claim, then they should have no problem starting the process. But just like them shoving the Affordable Healthcare Act (which now looks anything but affordable) down the American's throats, they are cowards and would rather do back-door, late-night deals, just like the cockroaches that they all are!


rightasrain 2 years, 7 months ago

Saxby Chambliss has called it quits when this term is over; obviously he no longer cares about his constituents since he is no longer concerned with reelection. Take note folks...you will see Chambliss kowtowing to the Democrats more and more.


GeeGee 2 years, 7 months ago

To change the amendment take 2/3 votes of the states. Not ever going to happen in our day.


FryarTuk 2 years, 7 months ago

You guys know the vote was only whether to allow a vote on the legislation right? I mean this vote wasn't the actual bill.


USTPC 2 years, 7 months ago

Yes, but now everything put up for a vote passes with a simple majority including amendments to the original gun bill (Feinstein weapons ban anyone?) and guess who has a majority of the votes in the Senate? That would be the anti-constitutional Socialist party.


Sign in to comment