0

Kansas trying to make sperm donor pay child support

William Marotta, who is being asked by the state of Kansas to pay child support after providing sperm to a same-sex couple, speaks about his ordeal at his attorney's office in Topeka, Kan. on Monday, Dec. 31, 2012. Angela Bauer told The Topeka Capital-Journal on Saturday that she and her former partner, Jennifer Schreiner, are "kind of at a loss" about the Kansas Department for Children and Families' recent decision to file a child support claim against William Marotta. Marotta provided sperm that was used to artificially inseminate Schreiner three years ago.

William Marotta, who is being asked by the state of Kansas to pay child support after providing sperm to a same-sex couple, speaks about his ordeal at his attorney's office in Topeka, Kan. on Monday, Dec. 31, 2012. Angela Bauer told The Topeka Capital-Journal on Saturday that she and her former partner, Jennifer Schreiner, are "kind of at a loss" about the Kansas Department for Children and Families' recent decision to file a child support claim against William Marotta. Marotta provided sperm that was used to artificially inseminate Schreiner three years ago.

TOPEKA, Kan. — A sperm donor in Kansas is fighting a state effort to force him to pay child support for a child conceived through artificial insemination by a lesbian couple.

William Marotta, 46, of Topeka said he is "a little scared about where this is going to go, primarily for financial reasons," The Topeka Capital-Journal (http://bit.ly/132b7Ji) reported Monday.

When he donated sperm to Angela Bauer and Jennifer Schreiner in 2009, Marotta relinquished all parental rights, including financial responsibility to the child. When Bauer and Schreiner filed for state assistance this year, the state demanded the donor's name so it could collect child support for the now 3-year-old girl. Bauer and Schreiner broke up in 2010 but co-parent their eight children, who range in age from 3 months to 25 years.

"In the long run, I think this will be a good thing, but I'm the one getting squashed," Marotta said. "I can't even believe it's gone this far at this point, and there's not a damn thing I can do about it."

Though his attorneys, Benoit Swinnen and Hannah Schroller, are charging him reduced rates, Marotta said he expects the legal fees to eventually be more than he can afford. He is predominantly a mechanic but said he is currently working in a different field. He and his wife, Kimberly, have no biological children but care for foster children.

"I've already paid more than 10 percent of my yearly salary, and I don't know many folks who are willing to give up more than 10 percent of their yearly income," he said.

The state contends the agreement between Marotta and the women is not valid because Kansas law requires a licensed physician to perform artificial insemination.

"Speaking generally, all individuals who apply for taxpayer-funded benefits through DCF are asked to cooperate with child support enforcement efforts," Angela de Rocha, a spokeswoman for the Kansas Department for Children and Families, said in a statement. "If a sperm donor makes his contribution through a licensed physician and a child is conceived, the donor is held harmless under state statue. In cases where the parties do not go through a physician or a clinic, there remains the question of who actually is the father of a child or children.

"DCF is required by statute to establish paternity and then pursue child support from the non-custodial parent," she wrote.

A hearing on a motion by Marotta's attorneys to dismiss the case is scheduled for Jan. 8 in Shawnee County District Court.

Bauer and Schreiner have said they fully support Marotta's efforts to fight the state's request. When Bauer was diagnosed in March with what she calls "a significant illness" that prevents her from working, Schreiner sought health insurance for their daughter from the state. The DCF told Schreiner if she didn't provide the sperm donor's name, it would deny any health benefits because she was withholding information.

Marotta said Monday he doesn't resent Schreiner for giving the state his name.

"I resent the fact that Jennifer was pressured into doing that in the first place," he said. "That was wrong — wrong by the state."

Comments

chinaberry25 1 year, 3 months ago

Sue for custody and it will be dropped.

0

agirl_25 1 year, 3 months ago

Angela Bauer and Jennifer Schreiner have 8 children huh, and truly need to be crowned the idiots of the year....or decade. Eight children via AI and are asking the poor man to pay child support for donating his sperm for their last child. If that doesn't take some nerve. I have no problem with anyone using AI to have a child but it seems to me that to have 8 and then to demand the man pay child support borders on the riduculous. I see the state contends the agreement is not valid because a licensed doctor did not perform the insemination!! This is going to get interesting. Get ready for the turkey baster jokes. Angela and Jennifer need to read up tubal ligation rather than artifical insemination.

0

tb_71 1 year, 3 months ago

You need to re-read the article. Bauer and Schreiner are not asking the man to pay anything - the state of Kansas is.

0

carpetdoc28 1 year, 3 months ago

Re-read the story, the couple is supporting his fight against the state. They are not coming after him, the state is.

0

agirl_25 1 year, 3 months ago

I still think they need to read up on tubal ligation, just my opinion. Mr. Marotta has the right idea.....foster parenting.

0

RedEric 1 year, 3 months ago

With all the dead beat dads running around free as a dodo. The state of Kansas goes after this guy. They obviously didn't like the idea of same sex couples. Probably why the AI was not done by a doctor. What a mess. The bureaucrats are confused.

1

bigbob 1 year, 3 months ago

I hope Kansas Is not run by libtards or this guy is screwed.

0

Sign in to comment