Albany gathering documents for Justice investigation

This residential property at 910 N. Davis St. in Albany is being proposed as a personal care home.

This residential property at 910 N. Davis St. in Albany is being proposed as a personal care home.

ALBANY -- City officials will send the U.S. Department of Justice certification documents today requested by the agency as part of a Justice investigation into zoning and land-use practices of the city as they apply to the Fair Housing Act and Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

The investigation centers around Randy and Lauren Bailey's attempts to open a community residence facility for disabled citizens at 910 N. Davis St. The Baileys had planned to create a personal care home at the address when, first, the Albany City Commission, and most recently, the Albany Dougherty Planning Commission, denied their request based on a distance requirement in an ordinance that was passed after the Baileys attempted to open the facility.

In a letter sent to City Attorney Nathan Davis and obtained by The Albany Herald through an Open Records Act request, Steven H. Rosenbaum, the chief of DOJ's Housing and Civil Enforcement Section, said the agency's investigation is preliminary in nature.

"We believe that both the public interest and the interests of the city will best be served by our having complete and accurate information about the city's zoning and land use practices with respect to residences for persons with disabilities," Rosenbaum wrote. "To that end, we ask that you send the information requested in Atachment A to Beth Frank, the attorney handling this matter ...

"We have attempted to limit the areas of inquiry to expedite the initial phase of this investigation and are willing to work with you to minimize any burdens that would be imposed upon you or your staff in obtaining this information."

Davis said the information sought by the Justice Department would be dispatched to Washington next week.

"By (today), we have to send them certification documents indicating that so-and-so will be in charge of gathering and discharging the documents," the city attorney said. "The actual documents they have requested are due next week. That information is readily available, and we'll be able to respond in the timely manner that they have requested."

Randy Bailey informed The Herald he and his wife had been contacted by DOJ after the Planning Commission refused last week to reconsider his request for a variance to the section of the new ordinance that requires a minimum 1,000-foot distance between such community residences. The house at 910 N. Davis is about 735 feet from an existing facility in the Rawson Circle neighborhood.

Residents who live in that neighborhood launched a heated campaign to keep the Baileys from creating the personal care home that would allow them to relocate disabled citizens who had previously been cared for in a state-run Thomasville facility. All such facilities have been ordered shut down as part of a federal lawsuit in which the state was found to have been "warehousing" disabled persons under its facilities' care.

The residents argued first that their neighborhood would be negatively impacted by the care facility, and subsequently that it would decrease property values and create an institutional setting in "one of the last decent neighborhoods left in Albany."

Randy Bailey said Thursday the hoopla over he and Lauren Bailey's attempts to locate the personal care home at the North Davis residence had led everyone involved astray from the real issue.

"The Fair Housing Act was put in place to protect everybody, not just persons with disabilities," he said. "Certainly, though, this situation involves people who don't have a voice, who can't advocate for themselves. We care for these people, and we advocate for them."

Rosenbaum stressed in his letter that his office had made no determination whether the city had violated the Fair Housing or Americans With Disabilities acts, but he asked Davis for "any and all records, documents, files and tapes that may be relevant to this investigation ... within 10 days of the date of this letter (April 30)."

"The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of disability and other protected categories," the DOJ official wrote. "The FHA's enforcement provisions authorize the Attorney General to commence a civil action whenever he has reasonable cause to believe that a person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice of housing discrimination, or that any group of persons has been denied rights under the act and the denial raises an issue of general public importance.

"Similarly, the ADA authorizes the Attorney General to commence a civil action under Title II."

Davis said Thursday he has no way of knowing whether DOJ has grounds for action against the city based on actions of the City or Planning commissions.

"There's way too much we don't know at this point to figure out what the Department of Justice is specifically looking for," Davis said. "If I could figure the way DOJ -- or any other federal agency -- operates, I wouldn't be working right now. I'd be retired to my condo on the beach."


ilovealbany 2 years, 6 months ago

They might "care and advocate" for these people, but leave the emotions out of it. They also make money off of these people and the service they provide. Let's be honest, money is the driving force behind this issue, not disabled people's well being.


RedEric 2 years, 6 months ago

Money is the issue as it will cost multiples more to keep the residents in a personal care home as opposed to an institution. The worst part of this whole scheme is that a personal care home will not have a psychiatrist, social worker, dietician or security person etc. on staff. Any improvement in condition that might have been possible in an institution with trained professional staff is at an end. These people will be truly warehoused. Does anyone actually believe the risk of abuse and neglect is not higher in dozens of scattered personal care homes than in a single easily monitored institution. This process started by Bazelon is despicable.


Sister_Ruby_Two 2 years, 6 months ago

There is no way this should be a DOJ issue. Nobody was discriminated against. There are several lawful constraints about turning this residence in a Historic District into a multi-family residential business. No ADA violations. Nobody was run out of their house. No disabled person applied for the permit, it was a bidness man. The answer is NO.

BUT the truism still holds "I'm from the Government and I'm here to hose you"


Beth 2 years, 6 months ago

As I've said before...if the investigation went a bit further, it would find some very interesting things regarding the legitimate certification and licensure they are claiming and filing on their tax returns.


erock 2 years, 6 months ago

These folks think that they can hide behind that veil of "we want to help someone. " First thing they are going to do after bilking all they can get from these people and their families, is skip town. Of course there will be some that will find out the hard way. I would certainly like to see their credentials. I love the Lord too, but that doesn't qualify me as an astronaut does it?


Sign in to comment