Make gun use a child safety issue

Opinion column

After a rural Kentucky family suffered an unspeakable gun tragedy late last month, that sad story, unfortunately, became new fuel for the scorching debate over gun control. When news broke that 5-year-old Kristian Sparks had shot his 2-year-old sister with a rifle he had been given as a gift, opposing factions latched on to either defend rural America’s gun culture or to denounce it.

Having grown up in Alabama, steeped in the Deep South’s gun culture, I feel nothing but sympathy for the Sparks family. One child is dead; another will be scarred for life by his horrible mistake. And Caroline Sparks is just one of many: The careless handling of guns sends Americans to their graves with mind-numbing frequency.

Indeed, in the days since she died, other children have been wounded or killed in accidental shootings. On May 1, 3-year-old Darrien Nez shot himself dead with his grandmother’s handgun in Yuma, Ariz. On May 4, a 13-year-old boy in Oakland Park, Fla., accidentally shot his 6-year-old sister in the chest, injuring her critically.

That, by the way, is just a partial list. According to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, an average of eight Americans under the age of 20 are killed by firearms every day. While urban children are more likely to be homicide victims, Brady says, rural children are more likely to be suicides or victims of accidental shootings.

But the mindless political punches and counter-punches, finger-pointing and blame-assessing do little to curb the death toll. If concerned grown-ups really want to save children from accidental gun discharges, we ought to separate those gun accidents from the broader debate over gun control, which is hopelessly mired in partisan madness.

Instead, let’s discuss this as a child safety issue. There are plenty of precedents in American cultural history for focusing on child safety even if it impinges on the convenience of adults. One of the best examples is the decades-long crusade to make child safety seats a familiar part of child care.

That doesn’t mean it will be easy to bring some commonsense child safety measures — legally enforceable measures — to routine gun use. There are many factions who are eager to keep any discussion of guns locked into a doctrinaire set of talking points. And, of course, the most ferocious and fanatical factions of the gun lobby — notably the National Rifle Association — will have no use for even the mildest reforms aimed at stemming the carnage.

For years now, the NRA has insisted that children ought to be armed for sport shooting right alongside their parents; it offers firearms safety courses as the surefire way to protect them from injury. However, while gun safety courses are a good idea, they are no substitute for age-appropriate gun handling, adult supervision or safe storage of firearms.

The availability of firearms courses may have lured some parents into a false sense of security, leading them to believe that preschool or elementary-aged children can handle weapons prudently without supervision. That’s just ridiculous.

To reinforce that, we need an all-out crusade with an emphasis on proper supervision of the youngest sport shooters, as well as safe storage of weapons when they are not in use. Adults who fail in their responsibilities, allowing children to be hurt or killed, should face criminal sanctions in each and every case.

That won’t be an easy cultural shift: In homes already facing a tragedy, as the Sparkses do, local law enforcement officials will be reluctant to press charges. While national efforts to reinforce the shift can help, the best results will come from persistent and courageous efforts by local leaders, including state legislators, police, prosecutors and physicians.

My own father was a nut about gun safety -- my brother didn’t get his first rifle until he was about 11, and he was closely supervised -- but Dad’s conscientiousness didn’t extend to all my relatives. When I was 11, I picked up a loaded handgun off a bedside table at an uncle’s house and aimed it at my brother, then 2. I thought it was a toy.

I don’t know why I didn’t pull the trigger. My brother was saved by fate or caprice or the grace of God. Too many children don’t get that lucky.

Cynthia Tucker, winner of the 2007 Pulitzer Prize for commentary, is a visiting professor at the University of Georgia. She can be reached at cynthia@cynthiatucker.com.


waltspecht 2 years, 6 months ago

Glad you quoted the Brady group as factual and the NRA as fanatical. I don't hold with either statement. Both groups will use statistics of questionable nature for their own purposes. Now the NRA runs Eddie Eagle and Hunter Safety programs, as well as competative shooting in a highly supervised enviornment. Just what does the Brady group do along the education lines? Besides spreading misinformation that is? As to children and guns. I feel we have shifted to a society that forces our children to grow up too fast. We don't allow them to play out their youth. Instead we make little adults out of them all too soon. Adults in thought only, not responsibility or action. You mention child safety seats, yet we still continually read about all sorts of deaths and accidents where no such seat was employed, even though it was required by law. Laws don't work unless the people are willing to be governed by them. What has apparently left the world is personal human responsibility. I spent all of my Summers working on my Uncle Karl's Dairy Farm. There were loaded guns, accessiable all the time. We were taught from a very young age what they were capable of, and how to safely use them. One of my jobs when I was nine was to shoot rats and groundhogs with a Remington Model 6 and 22 shorts. My Brother and Cousins before me had done the same. We were prperly shown what was expected, and we followed the rules. That is both Parental responsibility and personal responsibility. Something sadly lacking in this day and age.


USMCRetE9 2 years, 6 months ago

MGySgt, USMC I checked e-how.com and found some interesting numbers. In 2009, 1,387 children between the ages of 7 & 13 died from accidental injury. Over half of these death were related to vehicle accidents. Then in order fire, drowning, other transportation accidents, suffocation, poisoning, and only then firearms. The next leading cause of death in this age group was all forms of cancer {664 deaths}. Followed by Congenital anomalies which killed 242 children in this age group. Followed again by Heart conditions which killed 189 children in this age group. Finally, 160 children in this age group were killed in a homicide, about half with a firearm, and the other half by some other means. So in 2009, about 80 children were killed in homicides with a firearm as the cause of death. But this data conflicts dramatically with the numbers quoted above from the Brady Group. Why don't we start at the top of the list and talk about placing a ban on vehicles. At least we won't be in conflict with the Constitution discussing such a ban.


Sign in to comment