0

Squawk of the day - May 30, 2013

"I think China is setting a good example for people having babies. The limit is one."

Comments

dickyboy 10 months, 3 weeks ago

What do they do if they have more than one? Firing squad?

0

dickyboy 10 months, 3 weeks ago

Let's see how long it lasts GG...

0

MRKIA 10 months, 3 weeks ago

IT'S A DONE DEAL PEOPLE. IT'S OVER. IT'S NOT EVEN A SQUAWK.

0

dickyboy 10 months, 3 weeks ago

Let's push for midnight GG....

0

dickyboy 10 months, 3 weeks ago

Only if they can prove they can afford more than one child...no government help involved... Sort of like the Kennedy's... A mash fortune going to one child might not work...

0

Terry.Lewis 10 months, 3 weeks ago

Other than the rule would eventually ensure extinction of the species, I think it's a swell idea.

0

Sherwood_Eagle_Alum 10 months, 3 weeks ago

I commented on this SOTD under my FB account and now it's not showing up. What gives?

0

Terry.Lewis 10 months, 3 weeks ago

I have no idea. I assume there will be some bugs to be worked out, but that is above my pay grade

1

chinaberry25 10 months, 3 weeks ago

Eventually nature will take care of excess births. There will be a pandemic in the near future. It always happens and we are past due. It is sad for a child to be produced just so you can get a welfare check. There must be a special place for them in the hereafter. We as a country will also pay for it because we are rewarding these bimbos.

0

dsgb19us 10 months, 3 weeks ago

And what if you are included in that pandemic? We will not have to see your sensless comments. Great for us.

0

chinaberry25 10 months, 3 weeks ago

I am a Christian and I am ready. Are you? As far as senseless goes it is most likely above your IQ to begin with. Nature does and always will weed out the weak. I plan to keep commenting, but gutless you will probably hide behind your useless self.

0

erudite 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Are you saying the nature rules and not a god?

0

dsgb19us 10 months, 2 weeks ago

IQ? And I guess you have a soaring IQ because you can comment with the best of them. I am also a Christian. But I don't read WALB to voice my opinion about every topic on the website. Just be happy you have the convience to read stories online and shut up SMARTY. chinaberry25 for "Commentor of the Year"

0

ZCorp 10 months, 3 weeks ago

Some " AKA Squarks are too Odd & Sad to even respond too, Sorry "

1

ZCorp 10 months, 3 weeks ago

Do any of you know that they have an over population of males to females like 10 to 1 in China, now, thanks to this rule.

1

VSU 10 months, 3 weeks ago

If we had that problem over here, we would have less babies having babies.

0

erudite 10 months, 2 weeks ago

According to the CIA, the latest sex ratio (men to women) in China is 113: 100. In the US, the ratio is 105:100.

0

erudite 10 months, 3 weeks ago

How many of you are 'pro-life'? Can't get an abortion but it's OK to kill them after they are born? State sanctioned murder; we call it the death penalty.

China has 2.8 BILLION people and India 2.5; these two countries account for over 50% of the world's population. The US does not even have 400 million people.

Instead of complaining about having to push one for English y oprima dos por espanol, methinks your fear should be held for the day we have to push one for Mandarin.

0

VSU 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Maybe nip it in the bud before it gets to that level, instead of waiting for it to happen. If these girls don't want the babies, then don't get pregnant in the first place.

0

erudite 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Why is it always the girl's fault? What role do men play here?

0

VSU 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Maybe the girl could just say no to sex? And if the guy forces sex on her then have him arrested for rape.

0

erudite 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Maybe he could not push for it?

0

Sally_O 10 months, 1 week ago

Or maybe she could keep her legs closed.

0

MisterEd 10 months, 2 weeks ago

I'm pro-life, or anti-abortion, or whichever phrase you choose to attach to the action. Some situations might warrant this action, such as if the mother's life would be in jeopardy. But to simply kill a child because of the stupidity of not using birth control..........no way. And since that child has done ZERO harm to another member of society, why should that life be terminated? As opposed to some douchesack that has brutally murdered a family, or raped an elderly woman and robbed her of her money and dignity? If you and your bleeding heart want to pay for housing, meals, medical, schooling, etc of dirtbags such as that, knock yourself out. Just don't expect everyone to get on board.

0

erudite 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Um, you are paying for the "douchesack" as you so eloquently stated. It's called prison.

Why is the WOMAN always the responsible one for no birth control? Why don't guys just automatically use it?

Follow the thread; the call was for the US to do the same thing.

0

erudite 10 months, 3 weeks ago

Oh, and how many of you have an older brother? You would be the dead one in this case. Think long and hard about what you are advocating.

0

FryarTuk 10 months, 2 weeks ago

In order to avoid extinction population reproduction rate has to be at about 1.65 per household. That is why China is aging so rapidly and moving toward an endangered level with the attendant issues.

0

Sign in to comment