Jump to content
First U.S. Ebola case confirmed September 30, 2014
"Why is that allowed to go on in that neighborhood"
Sorry, you just cant' keep black males and children out of your neighborhood any more like fifty years ago. FYI, its not agains the law to be black, male or a child. How can you not see how racist that sounds?
Sorry guys, but you all sound as bad as Jesse, Al, Heard, and the rest of the racists on the other side of that coin.
"As one who takes this profession and its requirements seriously,"
You are correct. If they fill out the paperwork and lie about their felony convicition, they can be prosecuted. They are almost never, but they can be.
"the morals of so many young ladies encourage the crime.Both are guilty"
Wow.... Next time you get a thought, let it pass. At minimum, don't put it to print. You will look less foolish.
Seriously? You fault me for name calling and then go to doo-doo jokes? Wow, even for you, that reaches a new level of immaturity. How old are you, 13?
Let me clarify once again for you, since you can't seem to comprehend. I will type it slowly, so that you can keep up this time. There are already background check laws in place. Your president's boy, Holder, chooses not to enforce them. A new law is meaningless, in light of the fact that the old, similar law is ignored. Use your google machine and check for yourself. I'm sure you already did, and just ignore that data because it conflicts with what you are told to believe.
Calling that tripe that Tucker wrote an article is generous, even for a firearms fearmonger like yourself. Just forget your CNBC spoon fed rhetoric for a moment and try to think, Tuk. What possible good would it do to pass more restrictive background check laws when the current laws are universally ignored by you president's Attorney General? I read the proposed legislation in detail. It won't do a thing except provide soundbites to feed to fearful sheep like you and your ilk. If it had been in place prior to any of the mass shootings mentioned in your hero's "article" as you put it, the new law would not have prevented a single death. Here is a clue for you. There are millions of guns out there right now. Criminals will not abide by the new law. That's what criminals do, Tuk, they ignore the law.
Nor did Martin's death, but that didn't stop your hero from interjecting his racist, uninformed opinion, did it?
Another astute observation from Mommy's sweet boy. Don't you have a bible to polish or something?
From your perspective, its like whatever DCSS does is fine, as long as you are able to point the finger at someone else. Sure, the pervert is liable, criminally, but open your mind for just a second and take off your victim shaded racist glasses. If the school officials had simply followed the existing policy, the child doesn't get molested. Damn, man, think how you would feel if it were your child. Do you think you would feel a skin color apologist kinship in that case? You know damn well you would be hollering for blood. The blood of the idiot that exposed your child to the perverted whims of the predator that they allowed to prey on the kids.
Last login: Monday, May 20, 2013