Jump to content
Here's my brilliant idea - Cap offs are a necessary component of welfare. You can receive assistance for two kids tops!! Your third child is your responsibility; from medical bills, formula, and food to education and health care. Those who do not work should NOT receive earned income credit for their children. If you have no income and you completely live off the system, you receive NO TAX RETURN!! What you would have received will go back into the pot!
Once welfare mothers realize that they will not be rewarded for promiscuous behavior they will stop having so many kids. Once they realize they won't receive monies for the children, they will stop having them. Most of them don't care about the kids anyway - they just want the freebies! Stop the money, stop the needless breeding.
Thanks for the chuckle!! Too cute!!
YOU CAN NOT BE SERIOUS???? The City of Albany has more incompentence than I have EVER SEEN!!! I know becasue I worked there; notice the past tense of the verb!!!
Drinking a carton of Eggnog a day should help out. Man, I think I could drink tons of that stuff, but I happen to be watching my figure!
As I've stated many times, if monies are cut for out- of -wedlock children, this cycle would stop!!! IT ONLY CONTINUES BECAUSE THEY ARE REWARDED FOR THIS TYPE OF BEHAVIOR!!! CUT OUT THE MONEY; MAKE A CHANGE!!!! THE DOWNFALL OF THE FAMILY IS ALMOST COMPLETE!!! STOP CHILDREN FROM HAVING CHILDREN FOR A WELFARE CHECK!! THE CHILDREN ARE THE ONES THAT SUFFER!!!
I couldn't have said it better myself!! The children are neglected and treated horribly which continues the cycle of poverty and/or abuse. It's worse to be poor and abused, than comfortable and abused though. Some of those children don't have decent clothes or food to eat but they all have access to inappropriate music, shows, facebook, and they are shown a horrible example by their "parents". Children as young as six or eight are responsible for younger siblings and cousins and most of the time the children are not supervised but left to guide themselves. WHAT A SHAME!!
I love them all! I could think of a few more "restrictions" for welfare (I have mentioned these in the past),but overall I think these five will work for now.
To elaborate more on what Red Eric wrote, I have seen what some of these welfare queens receive in montly assistance and it is more than what a lot of people make earning wages!! THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM!!! If I have to budget my money and sacrifice things to live within my means, THEN THEY SHOULD HAVE TO TOO!!
Chinaberry, I thought I had an genious way to solve the epidemic of generational welfare, but you gave me a new idea. PAY UP FRONT AND NO EPIDURAL! My ideas, plus this will curb system abuse, GUARANTEED!!!!
The difference is that his name meant something to him, it was his grandfather's name. What does Johntreavious mean? But.... you do have a point.
Did you notice Domorico Terrail?
Last login: Wednesday, June 19, 2013