Jump to content
I actually prefer a .45 ACP. :-)
I always enjoy civil discussions. It helps us at least consider a different viewpoint. :-) I have enjoyed debating with you and others on here. Unfortunately, this will be my last comment on AH due to the change to a FB sign on. I have no need for the headaches that could result from posting controversial opinions under my real name.
Gun companies are cashing in.....on the threat by the Socialist party and Obama administration to limit what you can buy or have.
If the Socialist party and Obama administration came out and stated that they are dropping any attempt to limit the rights of individuals under the second amendment and their actions supported their words you would see normality return. Until they do that, it will continue to spark gun sales and ammo hoarding.
There is some common ground between gun advocates and gun control advocates but not what is being proposed.
More laws restricting law abiding citizens that will be ignored by criminals is useless. Want to require training prior to purchasing your first gun? Great, I am for that. Want to require that you get re-certified every 5-10 years? Great I am for that too. Want to limit me to 7 rounds? Sorry, that I will not agree to. Want to prevent me from owning weapons of my choosing like an AR15? Sorry, I will not agree to that either. As far as mental illness preventing you from owning a gun....if you specifically define criteria that we would all agree should prevent you from owning a gun I could probably agree to that as well but leave it general with multiple interpretations so that something as simple as seeing a psychiatrist would prevent you from owning a gun then no, I would not agree to that.
As far as reaching your weapon in time...I keep mine by the bed at night and on my side during the day. If you have multiple weapons then a safe is a good idea and common sense especially if you are not home.
Last comment I will be making for what it is worth.
Gun Companies behind the scare tactics of the government? Do you watch the news? The Obama administration stated their goal was more gun control and numerous Democrats actually stated their goal was to eventually eliminate all guns in private citizens hands.
If I am a Christian soldier and I read the Bible every night and I pray to my Lord and Savior every night do you consider that proselytizing? And if I am doing that and one of my bunk mates asks me about my faith and I answer him is that proselytizing?
I ask because by definition that is not proselytizing but based on what the US military is proposing it would be. They are in fact proposing that Christian soldiers would not be able to have any outward show of faith. In addition to that they are only targeting Christian proselytizing. Islam, Buddhism, atheism, and agnosticism they have no issue with.
You cannot single out one religion and allow others and you cannot force a person not to show any outward sign of their faith or it violates their right to practice their religion.
Woo hoo....potential new scandal coming your way.
LMAO....you liberals never cease to amaze me. Liberals state that everything that happened while Bush was President was Bush's fault but then turn around and state that nothing that happens since Obama got elected and re-elected is Obama's fault. How do you sleep at night?
Deniability. He tells those under him that do what they have to but do not tell him what they are doing so he has full deniability.
Eric Holder did the same thing. He "recused" himself from the AP issue so that he could deny any involvement if it went South.
If in fact he had no idea what his deputy AG was doing then he needs to lose his job for incompetence and lack of leadership. Same applies to Obama.
Then in reaction to the violent reaction martial law is imposed and then never removed and Obama becomes the dictator he desires to be.
Last login: Friday, August 23, 2013