Senators_combo.jpg

Georgia Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler

ATLANTA — Both of Georgia’s U.S. senators are calling for a Senate vote on a successor to the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg sooner rather than later.

Shortly after Ginsburg died Friday night at age 87 due to complications from pancreatic cancer, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said he would begin the process of filling the vacancy as soon as President Donald Trump makes a nomination, which is expected late this week.

“I am confident that President Trump will nominate another highly qualified candidate who will strictly uphold the Constitution,” Sen. David Perdue, R-Ga., said during the weekend. “Once the president announces a nomination, the United States Senate should begin the process that moves this to a full Senate vote.”

Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., called for a Senate vote during an appearance Saturday on Fox News.

“We need to bring forward a conservative justice – someone who will be a strict constructionist, who will protect innocent life, who will bring those Second Amendment cases and make sure we’re protecting our right to bear arms in this country,” Loeffler said. “And we need to keep that process moving – regardless of it being an election year.”

Democrats are arguing the decision on the next Supreme Court justice should await the results of the November presidential and Senate elections.

But so far, only two Senate Republicans – Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska – have said they would oppose a Senate vote on Ginsburg’s successor before Election Day.

(1) comment

Red dog

I say go ahead and pick the nominee. The Democrats are crying about that, but then again they cry all the time anyway. Face it, Trump would not do anything the dishonest democrats wouldn't do. No doubt in my mind if the situation was reversed, the Democrats would not hesitate to name a new justice. Maybe the Democrats of yesterday wouldn't, but today's liberal Democrats would. The only reason the Demorats are upset is because they are not in this position. The Liberal judges don't follow the constitution, they rule by personal agendas and not what is law in the books. They say they will riot if they move along with the pick, well they have been rioting for the past few months so what difference does that make?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.