Opponents slam bill reining in content regulation by social media platforms

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Dave Williams Capitol Beat News Service

ATLANTA — Legislation prohibiting giant social media platforms from censoring content based on the author’s viewpoint drew criticism on several fronts in a Georgia House committee.

Some opponents argued the bill, which the state Senate passed two weeks ago, is an unconstitutional violation of the free-speech rights of companies including Facebook and Twitter. Others said it could foster harassment of vulnerable young people.

Senate Bill 393 would prohibit social media platforms with more than 20 million followers from discriminating against an author posting content based not only on the person’s viewpoint but his or her race, color, ethnicity, religious or political beliefs, national origin, sex, gender or sexual orientation. The companies still could keep obscene or pornographic content off their sites.

“What we’re trying to do with this bill is eliminate viewpoint-based censorship,” Sen. Greg Dolezal, R-Cumming, the bill’s chief sponsor, told members of the House Judiciary Committee.

The legislation was sparked when Facebook and Twitter suspended former President Trump’s accounts last year following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters.

Similar bills to the Georgia measure passed by lawmakers in Texas and Florida are being challenged in court. Opponents argued Wednesday the Georgia bill’s backers should wait for the results of those cases before moving forward.

“Why should Georgians have to pay for the litigation?” Rep. Matthew Wilson, D-Brookhaven asked. “Why not wait to see what the courts say?”

Rep. Mike Wilensky, D-Dunwoody, said giving people virtually free rein to post content on giant social media platforms would allow cyber bullying of teens. In some instances, teenagers have committed suicide after being targeted on social media.

“These platforms are doing a good job these days controlling harassment,” Wilensky said. “This bill will eliminate these platforms from saving lives.”

But Dolezal said his bill would allow social media platforms to prevent harassment. He said his bill would strike a blow for free speech and open discussion.

“Social media companies are the 21st century public square,” he said. “Any idea — no matter how asinine — we believe there is room in this country to discuss.”

The committee will hold at least one more hearing on the bill before deciding whether to move it forward.

Special Illustration

Author

Except for a brief period, Albany Herald Editor Carlton Fletcher has been a newspaperman, working as Sports Writer/Columnist for the weekly Ocilla Star, as Sports Writer/Sports Editor with The Tifton Gazette, and as Sports Writer/Copy Editor/News Reporter/Features Editor and Editor of the paper. He has won numerous awards for sports, news, business and column writing, including a first-place Business Writing award in last year’s Georgia Press Association awards competition.

Read Carlton’s stories.

Phone: 229-888-9300

$0.99 for Your First Month!

Get full access to The Albany Herald with our special offer.

Close the CTA

Attention home delivery customers:
Starting March 4, your paper will be delivered by the post office.

We appreciate your patience.
Questions? Call 229-888-9300.

Sovrn Pixel